Early Review of draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-05
|Requested revision||No specific revision (document currently at 13)|
|Team||Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)|
|Requested by||Christian Amsüss|
|Authors||Michael Richardson , Carsten Bormann|
|I-D last updated||2021-07-26|
Iotdir Early review of -05
by Mohit Sethi
Opsdir Early review of -05 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
For OpsDir, one question here is whether the terminology for prefixes and address-with-prefix is right. For both (but especially IoTdir), this is also about dissemination and possibly pulling in references to cases where this would be (or could have been) useful.
|Reviewed revision||05 (document currently at 13)|
|Result||Ready with Issues|
In the abstract, perhaps "describes" could be "specifies"/"defines"? It might make sense to provide references to the definition of tags 260 and 261. I had to look them up. "was removed in this specification" -> "is removed in this specification"? "When applied to an array that starts with a number"? Is 'number' the correct terminology? I confused it with the tag number? What would happen to tags 260 and 261. Are they now discouraged/forbidden? Are they meant to co-exist with 52 and 54?