Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cbor-update-8610-grammar-05
review-ietf-cbor-update-8610-grammar-05-artart-lc-salgueiro-2024-05-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-cbor-update-8610-grammar
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2024-06-05
Requested 2024-05-22
Authors Carsten Bormann
I-D last updated 2024-11-18 (Latest revision 2024-06-24)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Roni Even (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Gonzalo Salgueiro (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Gonzalo Salgueiro
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-cbor-update-8610-grammar by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/JGJpdn06glPUskkaMUAK_Kwk8Jc
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-05-29
review-ietf-cbor-update-8610-grammar-05-artart-lc-salgueiro-2024-05-29-00
I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
just like any other last call comments.

This is a Standards Track document that updates RFC 8610 by addressing 
errata and making other small fixes for the ABNF grammar defined for CDDL 
there. This is well written, clear, and concise. This document is ready
for publication.

Small note around usability. Not being as familiar with 8610, I found 
myself having to back and forth frequently between documents. My guess 
is document intent and implementer experience has been extensively 
discussed within WG, so I'll simply mention it in passing.



Thanks, 
Gonzalo