Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-16
review-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-16-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2015-01-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-01-17 | |
Requested | 2015-01-02 | |
Authors | Jianrui Han , Greg M. Bernstein , Young Lee , Dan Li , Wataru Imajuku | |
I-D last updated | 2015-01-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -16
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -19 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Warren "Ace" Kumari (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -16 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -16 by Tomonori Takeda (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
State | Completed Snapshot | |
Review |
review-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-16-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2015-01-23
|
|
Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 20) | |
Result | Has Nits | |
Completed | 2015-01-23 |
review-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-16-opsdir-lc-korhonen-2015-01-23-00
My apologies for this review being somewhat late.. Anyway, I was assigned as the OPS-DIR reviewer for draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-17. Since I am not an expert on the topic this I-D covers treat the comments accordingly. Also, you should treat these comments as any LC comments. Short summary: The I-D is ready with minor editorial nits. Operational & management concerns: None. This I-D just defines generic protocol agnostic encoding formats that are to be used by others. The I-D does not even require IANA actions. Editorials (I use the idnits line numbering): * line 124: WSON is never expanded. It might be obvious for the authors but expanding the acronym on the first use would be nice. * Line 1157 [Switch] G. Bernstein, Y. Lee, A. Gavler, J. Martensson, " Modeling ^^^ * Line 303: The "Switching Cap" gets used as a short name for "Switching Capability" but that is not described anywhere. One the other hand for "Connectivity" a short name "Conn" is described. * Line 355: The "RstType" gets introduced as a short name for "RestrictionType". * Line 344: RestrictType ^^^ * Line 708: "Note that that.." ^^^^^^^^^^ * Line 742: "..Num Label bits" ^^^ 's' missing - Jouni