Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14
review-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14-genart-lc-housley-2013-08-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-09-02
Requested 2013-08-22
Authors Fatai Zhang , Dan Li , Han Li , Sergio Belotti , Daniele Ceccarelli
I-D last updated 2013-08-24
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -14 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -14 by Steve Hanna (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 15)
Result Almost ready
Completed 2013-08-24
review-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14-genart-lc-housley-2013-08-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-14
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2013-08-23
IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-02
IESG Telechat date: Unknown

Summary:  The document is almost ready for publication as a
informational RFC.  I raise minor concerns that should be resolved
before IESG evaluation.

Minor Concerns:  

In section 3, there is a discussion that includes ODU0, ODU2e, and ODU4,
but these terms are not defined in the paragraph or in the terminology
section.  I realize that these are ODUj values, but ODUflex is an ODUj,
and it is included in the terminology section.

In section 3.1, OCh needs to be defined or at least expanded.

In section3.1.2.1, please expand MSI on first use.


Editorial:

In section 8: s/not requests/no requests/