Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15
review-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15-opsdir-telechat-clarke-2022-11-26-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2022-11-29 | |
Requested | 2022-10-23 | |
Authors | Qilei Wang , Radha Valiveti , Haomian Zheng , Huub van Helvoort , Sergio Belotti | |
I-D last updated | 2022-11-26 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -11
by Susan Hares
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by David Mandelberg (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Joe Clarke (diff) Genart Last Call review of -12 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -14 by Joe Clarke (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -15 by Joe Clarke |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joe Clarke |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/wKlXRXEvsFF9D-n7-0e7wijC_9k | |
Reviewed revision | 15 | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2022-11-26 |
review-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-15-opsdir-telechat-clarke-2022-11-26-00
The past tense changes in -15 seem a bit odd to me, but they don't change the purpose of this document, and I still think it is ready from an OPS DIR perspective.