Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11
review-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-01-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-01-05
Requested 2013-12-12
Authors Attila Takacs , Don Fedyk , He Jia
I-D last updated 2014-01-09
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by David L. Black (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by David L. Black (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Warren "Ace" Kumari (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Magnus Nyström
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 13)
Result Has nits
Completed 2014-01-09
review-ietf-ccamp-oam-configuration-fwk-11-secdir-lc-nystrom-2014-01-09-00
 I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
 These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This document describes extensions to RSVP-TE in support of the establishment
of Operation, Administration and Management entities in the context of GMPLS .

The document seems well written. I would suggest removing the last sentence of
the Security Considerations section ("Cryptography can be used...") since it
does not really offer any hint as to how to use cryptography. Instead, the
previous sentence could be replaced with something like: "For a more
comprehensive discussion of GMPLS security, and attack mitigation techniques,
please see the
   Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks [

RFC5920

]."



-- Magnus