Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2016-10-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-10-24
Requested 2016-10-14
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Mehmet Ersue (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Review review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2016-10-20
Posted at https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06901.html
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 13)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2016-10-20
Review completed: 2016-10-20

Review
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-07-secdir-lc-shekh-yusef-2016-10-20

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 

IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 

security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 

these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: 

Ready

This is a Standard Track document that extend the GMPLS OSPF routing protocol by introducing 

an optional ISCD Availability sub-TLV, which could be used for route computation in a network that contains links with variable discrete bandwidth. This document defines the distribution mechanism for this new extension.

The Security Consideration section clearly describes the security and privacy issues with this new extension, and since this is only an extension to an existing mechanism, it points to other documents that cover the mechanism and the security implications and potential solutions.

Regards,

 Rifaat