Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08-opsdir-telechat-ersue-2017-02-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Telechat Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2017-01-03
Requested 2016-11-29
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Mehmet Ersue
Review review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08-opsdir-telechat-ersue-2017-02-05
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/AMOB6WUbsxVgHW0E5y5hQXNyQCs
Reviewed rev. 08 (document currently at 13)
Review result Has Nits
Draft last updated 2017-02-05
Review completed: 2017-02-05

Review
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08-opsdir-telechat-ersue-2017-02-05

I reviewed the document "OSPF-TE Link Availability Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth" (draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08.txt) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors.  
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track                           
Current IESG state: AD is watching
IANA State: IANA OK - Actions Needed

Summary: 
The document introduces an optional Interface Switching Capability Descriptor (ISCD) Availability sub-TLV to extend the GMPLS Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol for TE links with variable discrete bandwidth. It has been recently extended to make it generic to apply to multiple technologies. 

There are a few minor nits in the document:
The text in section 2 line 2 is misspelled: "include a< availability, bandwidth> information list in its OSPF"
s/e(s).The/e(s). The/

The document has been written with a proper language. 
I think the document does not cause any issue related to operations and management and can be published.

Mehmet