Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09-genart-telechat-korhonen-2017-02-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2017-03-14 | |
| Requested | 2017-02-14 | |
| Authors | Hao Long , Min Ye , Greg Mirsky , Alessandro D'Alessandro , Himanshu C. Shah | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-02-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Jonathan Hardwick (diff) Genart Telechat review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -08 by Mehmet Ersue (diff) Genart Telechat review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) Genart Telechat review of -10 by Jouni Korhonen (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09-genart-telechat-korhonen-2017-02-21
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-02-21 |
review-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-09-genart-telechat-korhonen-2017-02-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2017-02-21 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-24 IESG Telechat date: 2017-03-16 Summary: I have reviewed two earlier versions of this document. All my comments have been addressed. I am also happy to see my earlier comments generated (I believe) a draft addressing the generalized SCSI TLV specification work in TEAS, and this draft referencing to that work. Major issues: none. Minor issues: none. Nits/editorial comments: There are minor editorials here and there, but those will be picked up by the RFC editor in any case.