Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-11
review-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-11-secdir-lc-johansson-2014-05-22-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-05-13 | |
| Requested | 2014-04-03 | |
| Authors | Attila Takacs , Balazs Peter Gero, Hao Long | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-07-22) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11
by Scott W. Brim
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -12 by Scott W. Brim (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Leif Johansson (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2014-05-22 |
review-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-eth-oam-ext-11-secdir-lc-johansson-2014-05-22-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Even though the subject matter is outside my normal comfort zone I feel reasonably sure in saying that the draft is no worse from a security point of view than anything else in GMPLS-land. Cheers Leif