Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03
review-ietf-cdni-media-type-03-genart-lc-dupont-2015-10-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-cdni-media-type |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-10-13 | |
Requested | 2015-09-29 | |
Authors | Kevin J. Ma | |
I-D last updated | 2015-10-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -04 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Tero Kivinen (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Menachem Dodge (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-cdni-media-type by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-10-08 |
review-ietf-cdni-media-type-03-genart-lc-dupont-2015-10-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-cdni-media-type-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20151002 IETF LC End Date: 20151013 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - In 1 page 2: the CDNI abbrev should be introduced (i.e., the Abstract is considered as independent). Note that formally CDN and JSON abbrevs should be introduced too but IMHO it is no necessary here. - 2.1 page 3: RFCthis -> this RFC - 3.1 page 5: the Nits checker complains the RFC2119 reference is unused. BTW I saw the 04 version was published (without problematic changes rom 03). Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr