Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
review-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05-genart-lc-romascanu-2019-08-20-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-28
Requested 2019-08-14
Authors Ori Finkelman , Sanjay Mishra
I-D last updated 2019-08-20
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Zitao Wang (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/btHxn2OF5qYiWEG94ppKzA9ETA4
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2019-08-20
review-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05-genart-lc-romascanu-2019-08-20-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2019-08-20
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-28
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This document is ready from a Gen-ART perspective, with a couple of nits which
could be fixed in the RFC Editor processing after approval Major issues: None
Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments:

1. Several non-obvious acronyms are not expanded: FCI, FQDN
2. Section 3 - typo in the first paragraph '...the uCDN MUST be differnet ...'