Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16
review-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16-secdir-lc-xia-2020-07-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-07-16 | |
| Requested | 2020-07-02 | |
| Authors | Michael Niedermayer , Dave Rice , Jérôme Martinez | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-08-23 (Latest revision 2021-02-23) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Early review of -02
by Liang Xia
(diff)
Genart Early review of -03 by Matthew A. Miller (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -16 by Liang Xia (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -16 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Liang Xia |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1 by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jJJ3-k8A1dPbDhLk_8q3w9FGZ9Y | |
| Reviewed revision | 16 (document currently at 20) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2020-07-21 |
review-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16-secdir-lc-xia-2020-07-21-00
I have carried out the SecDir review for the -02 version, and all my nit concerns are addressed in current -16 version. But about my one question, I have not seen any response or actions: "Issues for clarification: In Security Considerations, besides the DoS attacks brought by the malicious payloads, is there any other kinds of attack possibly? For example, virus or worm are hidden in the malicious payloads to attack the system for more damages? Does it make sense and what's the consideration?" This time, is there any clarification? Thanks!