Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1-16

Request Review of draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-07-16
Requested 2020-07-02
Authors Michael Niedermayer , Dave Rice , Jérôme Martinez
I-D last updated 2020-07-21
Completed reviews Secdir Early review of -02 by Liang Xia (diff)
Genart Early review of -03 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -16 by Liang Xia (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -16 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -17 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Liang Xia
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-cellar-ffv1 by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-07-21
I have carried out the SecDir review for the -02 version, and all my nit
concerns are addressed in current -16 version.

But about my one question, I have not seen any response or actions: "Issues for
clarification: In Security Considerations, besides the DoS attacks brought by
the malicious payloads, is there any other kinds of attack possibly? For
example, virus or worm are hidden in the malicious payloads to attack the
system for more damages? Does it make sense and what's the consideration?"

This time, is there any clarification?