Last Call Review of draft-ietf-clue-datachannel-13
review-ietf-clue-datachannel-13-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2016-08-08-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-clue-datachannel
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2016-08-01
Requested 2016-07-11
Authors Christer Holmberg
I-D last updated 2016-08-08
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -13 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Bert Wijnen (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -15 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Bert Wijnen
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-clue-datachannel by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-08-08
review-ietf-clue-datachannel-13-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2016-08-08-00
Hi,


I revieweddraft-ietf-clue-datachannel-13.txt or the OPS-DIRectorate.

From an operational and network management point of view, I think
this document is fine and ready for publication.

One comment/question:
- in section 3.2.5 it states

   As defined in [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-channel], the dynamic address
   reconfiguration extension ('Supported Extensions Parameter'
   parameter) defined in [RFC5061] must be used to signal the support of
   the stream reset extension defined in [RFC6525].  Other features of
   [RFC5061] MUST NOT be used for CLUE data channels.

I wondered if it makes sense that the  "must be used" would better be
"MUST be used". This because the sentence uses "MUST NOT".

Just wondered.

Bert