Last Call Review of draft-ietf-clue-signaling-13
review-ietf-clue-signaling-13-secdir-lc-lonvick-2018-10-11-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-clue-signaling |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-10-17 | |
Requested | 2018-10-03 | |
Authors | Robert Hansen , Paul Kyzivat , Lennard Xiao , Christian Groves | |
I-D last updated | 2018-10-11 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -13
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Chris M. Lonvick (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Éric Vyncke (diff) Genart Telechat review of -14 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Chris M. Lonvick |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-clue-signaling by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 15) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-10-11 |
review-ietf-clue-signaling-13-secdir-lc-lonvick-2018-10-11-00
Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is READY. The Security Considerations section is appropriate for the document. It looks like all of the CLUE documents may become RFCs at, or near the same time. If that is the case, the authors and shepherd may want to include a common statement that implementers should read the security considerations sections of each of the other associated documents. Regards, Chris