Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07
review-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07-secdir-lc-sheffer-2013-09-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2013-09-26
Requested 2013-09-19
Authors Dr. Allyn Romanow , Stephen Botzko , Mark Duckworth , Roni Even
Draft last updated 2013-09-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Kathleen Moriarty (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Yaron Sheffer (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Yaron Sheffer
State Completed
Review review-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07-secdir-lc-sheffer-2013-09-26
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2013-09-26
review-ietf-clue-telepresence-use-cases-07-secdir-lc-sheffer-2013-09-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.



This document lists use cases of telepresence scenarios (a.k.a. 


videoconferencing, for those of us are not following).






I agree with the authors that such use cases do not need to include 


security considerations. There is often a fine line between use cases 


(or "problem statement") and requirements, and IMO requirements should 


include security issues or security expectations. But this document 


seems to be squarely on the use cases side of this line, and is fine as-is.




Thanks,
     Yaron