Last Call Review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-
review-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-genart-lc-melnikov-2012-04-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-04-12
Requested 2012-03-29
Authors Bob Briscoe, Richard Woundy, Alissa Cooper
Draft last updated 2012-04-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Alexey Melnikov
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Alexey Melnikov
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Shawn Emery
Assignment Reviewer Alexey Melnikov 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-genart-lc-melnikov-2012-04-04
Review completed: 2012-04-04

Review
review-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-genart-lc-melnikov-2012-04-04

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)


reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ 


at <

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>




Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
Review Date: 2012-04-04
IETF LC End Date: 2012-04-12
IESG Review: 2012-04-12



Summary: The document is nearly ready for publication as an 


Informational RFC (see one issue below)





Major issues: none

Minor issues:



This might be pedantic, but I think some of your Informational 


references are actually Normative, because they are needed to understand 


the document. See "IESG Statement: Normative and Informative References" 


for more details 


<

http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/normative-informative.html

>.






This almost doesn't matter for an Informational document, however if any 


of 5 drafts becomes Normative, publication of this document as an RFC 


will be delayed. Still, this might be better than just getting it 


published with "work in progress" references.




But otherwise this is a well written document and I enjoyed reading it.


Nits/editorial comments: none