Last Call Review of draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-
review-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-genart-lc-melnikov-2012-04-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2012-04-12 | |
Requested | 2012-03-29 | |
Authors | Bob Briscoe , Richard Woundy , Alissa Cooper | |
I-D last updated | 2012-04-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Alexey Melnikov
Genart Telechat review of -?? by Alexey Melnikov Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Shawn M Emery |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Alexey Melnikov |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Completed | 2012-04-04 |
review-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-genart-lc-melnikov-2012-04-04-00
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov Review Date: 2012-04-04 IETF LC End Date: 2012-04-12 IESG Review: 2012-04-12 Summary: The document is nearly ready for publication as an Informational RFC (see one issue below) Major issues: none Minor issues: This might be pedantic, but I think some of your Informational references are actually Normative, because they are needed to understand the document. See "IESG Statement: Normative and Informative References" for more details < http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/normative-informative.html >. This almost doesn't matter for an Informational document, however if any of 5 drafts becomes Normative, publication of this document as an RFC will be delayed. Still, this might be better than just getting it published with "work in progress" references. But otherwise this is a well written document and I enjoyed reading it. Nits/editorial comments: none