Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-core-cf-reg-update-04
review-ietf-core-cf-reg-update-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2025-02-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-core-cf-reg-update
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-03-10
Requested 2025-02-24
Authors Thomas Fossati , Esko Dijk
I-D last updated 2025-06-09 (Latest revision 2025-05-09)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Rich Salz (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Renzo Navas (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-core-cf-reg-update by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VigOb1ZmMOENftHki83-v7hYwc4
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-02-26
review-ietf-core-cf-reg-update-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2025-02-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-core-cf-reg-update-04
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review Date: 2025-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2025-03-10
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document updates and clarifies the procedures for registering CoAP
Content-Formats, is well written and easy to understand. However, I have one
editorial comment that I would like the authors to address.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:

It is a little confusing when the updates to RFC 7252 are in the IANA
Considerations section of the document. In addition, new procedures are added
in Sections 5.1 and 5.2, but those should be new 12.3 subsections in RFC 7252.

I suggest to have a dedicated "Updates to RFC 7252" section, where the text in
Sections 5.1 and Sections 5.2 are also added as new Sections 12.3.1 and
Sections 12.3.2 to RFC 7252.

For example:

----

4. Updates to RFC 7252

This Section updates Section 12.3, and adds the new Sections 12.3.1 and 12.3.2,
to [RFC7252].

4.1. Updates to Section 12.3

// The text in Section 5

4.2. New Section 12.3.1

// The text in Section 5.1

4.2. New Section 12.3.2

// The text in Section 5.2

----

The Security Considerations then become Section 5. The IANA Considerations
become Section 6, and there you only need to state something like:

"This document updates the IANA procedures of [RFC7252] for registering CoAP
Content-Formats."