Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-14
review-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-14-genart-lc-even-2025-07-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-07-29
Requested 2025-07-08
Authors Esko Dijk , Marco Tiloca
I-D last updated 2026-07-16 (Latest revision 2026-02-10)
Completed reviews Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Sean Turner (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -15 by Claudio Allocchio (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -15 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -15 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Sean Turner (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -15 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/_fQDMZwvxzd2_Oz9r-2owpv4ibw
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-07-24
review-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-14-genart-lc-even-2025-07-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2025-07-24
IETF LC End Date: 2025-07-29
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
I noticed the change from RFC7930 to a standard track RFC and based on the
mailing list discussion it looks OK

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: