IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-15
review-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-15-artart-lc-allocchio-2025-10-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2025-10-03
Requested 2025-07-08
Authors Esko Dijk , Marco Tiloca
I-D last updated 2026-02-05 (Latest revision 2026-01-29)
Completed reviews Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Sean Turner (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -15 by Claudio Allocchio (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -15 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -15 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Sean Turner (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -15 by Brian Haberman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Claudio Allocchio
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/P63KsdJivuGlzN5k1xepIz_lijE
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-10-06
review-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-15-artart-lc-allocchio-2025-10-06-00
I was assigned the ART review for this document when it was still -14, but now
I checked -15 where many of the comments received are implemented.

The document makes the protocol go from EXPERIMENTAL to PROPOSED STANDARD which
requires a much more robust implementation and testing in real interoperable
applications.

It is clearly speciefied, no major issues. Maybe still a bit too "case
descriptive" (or "example driven" for a protocol specification but this does
not harm its clear description of the various cases.

The -15 can go for publication

Claudio