Last Call Review of draft-ietf-core-senml-versions-02
review-ietf-core-senml-versions-02-secdir-lc-salowey-2021-05-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-core-senml-versions |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-05-03 | |
| Requested | 2021-04-19 | |
| Authors | Carsten Bormann | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-05-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -02
by Joseph A. Salowey
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-core-senml-versions by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/S4rN1WgqbL2wIYyVE8ict6Fr54c | |
| Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-05-01 |
review-ietf-core-senml-versions-02-secdir-lc-salowey-2021-05-01-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is the document is ready. This is a short document that describes how to encode features in the SenML version. The document is clear, I don't see any security. The encoding features in a version string will cause some confusion, but this is pointed out.