Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-cose-x509-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-cose-x509
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-10-01
Requested 2020-09-17
Authors Jim Schaad
I-D last updated 2020-09-18
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Carsten Bormann (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-cose-x509 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2020-09-18
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-cose-x509-07
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2020-09-18
IETF LC End Date: 2020-10-01
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication with nits.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 5

(Sn refers to Section n)
- S1: s/ad decided/and decided/
- S1: s/Since that time a/Since that time, a/
- S1: s/in the 6TiSCH environment [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap],
describes/in the 6TiSCH environment, [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap]
describes/ - S1: "A third scenario..." The wording seemed odd since there is no
text that sets the expectation that there will be three scenarios for
discussion.  If your intent is to enumerate the different scenarios, probably
best to prepare the reader for this ahead of time. - S2: s/which it can then
provide to/that it subsequently provides to/