Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-07-25
Requested 2017-07-11
Authors Russ Housley
I-D last updated 2017-07-23
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dacheng Zhang (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Review review-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-06-genart-lc-korhonen-2017-07-23
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-07-23
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2017-07-23
IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-25
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready to ship. Good that Proto Write-up took care of explaining

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.

Nits/editorial comments:  I just have one question whether the use of RFC2119
language in Section 5 Security Considerations is intentional? I mean here that
sometimes e.g. "must" is in lower case and sometimes other keywords are in
upper case e.g. "SHOULD NOT".