Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
review-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03-secdir-lc-gondrom-2014-01-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-01-23 | |
| Requested | 2014-01-16 | |
| Authors | Ólafur Guðmundsson | |
| Draft last updated | 2014-01-30 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by
Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -03 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Tobias Gondrom (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tobias Gondrom |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03-secdir-lc-gondrom-2014-01-30
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
| Result | Has Nits | |
| Completed | 2014-01-30 |
review-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03-secdir-lc-gondrom-2014-01-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the
security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents
being processed by the IESG. These comments were written
primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
The document is basically just about acronyms to simplify DANE
conversations
Th
e
document appears ready for publication.
The security consideration
section is sufficient and there are no security issues with
this document.
There are only two small nits / spelling issues:
in section "Abstract":
- s/Experience has show that/Experience has shown that
- speaking of acronyms, the first mention of TLSA should spell
it out.
Thank you and best regards.
Tobias