Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16
review-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16-genart-lc-romascanu-2015-05-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-05-07
Requested 2015-04-23
Authors Viktor Dukhovni , Wes Hardaker
Draft last updated 2015-05-06
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -16 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -17 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16-genart-lc-romascanu-2015-05-06
Reviewed revision 16 (document currently at 19)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2015-05-06
review-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16-genart-lc-romascanu-2015-05-06-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at



<

https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=mb_ePFTrh4SrJtyhoUSSxm3VeVCCfkSyGSgcyusg8UA&s=DcFaQTeDfxbYZdHOC8LSldAdZ87N4zFiXuKx99Z2seU&e=

>.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.



Document:

draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-16

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 5/6/15

IETF LC End Date: 5/7/15

IESG Telechat date: (if known)



Summary:



Ready with minor comments.

I liked the operational considerations section and the security consideration
section – very useful in putting this work in the context of other similar
contributions.



Major issues:



None.



Minor issues:



As the document uses heavily the term ‘downgrade’ (downgrade attack,
downgrade-resistant) it would be nice to either explain or provide a reference
for what it means in the context of this work.



Nits/editorial comments:



The last paragraph in section 2.2.1, page 15 has a comment marked twice by --.
This may be an editorial left-over to be corrected.