Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap-
review-ietf-dccp-udpencap-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-06-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2012-06-01
Requested 2012-05-18
Authors Thomas R. Phelan , Gorry Fairhurst , Colin Perkins
I-D last updated 2020-01-21 (Latest revision 2012-06-25)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU)
Assignment Reviewer Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU)
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Result Ready
Completed 2012-06-19
review-ietf-dccp-udpencap-secdir-lc-tsou-2012-06-19-00
Hi,
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

I find one case which can be a small disadvantage: both sides have to be
updated to use tunneling, even if only one side is blocked by NAT. Can we
handle this case?

Tina
Sent from my IPv6 address 2001:0:4137:9e76:20f1:518:f56e:f6a5