Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-08
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-08-genart-lc-halpern-2023-12-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2023-12-22
Requested 2023-12-08
Authors Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Andrew G. Malis
I-D last updated 2023-12-19
Completed reviews Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Tatuya Jinmei (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -08 by Olivier Bonaventure (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Bruno Decraene (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mjG8pykkgdMPsjr3JbMm0qE86UA
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2023-12-19
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-08-genart-lc-halpern-2023-12-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-08
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2023-12-19
IETF LC End Date: 2023-12-22
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues: N/A

Nits/editorial comments:
    The term PREOF is used without any expansion or definition in the
    introduction.  Some elaboration of the term should be included at first
    usage. It may make sense to define F-label even though all the references
    to it in this document are saying that it is not used.  As a reader, I was
    left inferring what was not being done.