Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05-rtgdir-lc-andersson-2021-01-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2021-01-15
Requested 2021-01-04
Requested by Deborah Brungard
Authors Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Andrew G. Malis , Stewart Bryant
I-D last updated 2021-01-17
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Loa Andersson (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Ines Robles (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Tim Chown (diff)
Comments
Prep for Last Call
Assignment Reviewer Loa Andersson
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/0rODsDTVD7y205m0LVghu8LcmFY
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-01-17
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn-05-rtgdir-lc-andersson-2021-01-17-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. 
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related 
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and 
sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide 
assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing 
Directorate, please see ​ 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it 
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF 
Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through 
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-tsn
Reviewer: Loa Andersson
Review Date: date
IETF LC End Date: -
Intended Status: Informational

Summary:

No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

The draft is well and clearly written and addresses a real issue, the 
relationship between the MPLS layer flow and a TSN flow,

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.
Nits:

I found very few nits, mostly typos and suggestion for the abbreviation 
list. The are included in included word file, the authors may use or 
discard as they want.

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64