Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06

Request Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-09-10
Requested 2020-08-27
Authors Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Lou Berger , Andrew G. Malis , Stewart Bryant
Draft last updated 2020-09-01
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -04 by Harish Sitaraman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Stephen Farrell (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Review review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2020-09-01
Posted at
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Almost Ready
Completed 2020-09-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review Date: 2020-09-01
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-10
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: In general I think the document is almost ready for publication, but I
have a few minor issues and nits that I would like the authors to address.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:

Q1: In the last paragraph of Section 4, there is a statement from RFC 7510
aboout MPLS-in-UDP not being allowed on the general Internet etc. I think it
should be explicitly indicated whether that also applies to this document. The
document talks about "IP networks", but it is unclear what the scope really is.
And, if  the RFC 7510 statement does apply to this document, I think it shall
be stated much earlier: either in the Introduction, or in a dedicated
Applicability Section.

Nits/editorial comments:

Q2: In the Introduction, I like to have the this-document-does-this-and-that
text at the end. If possible, please consider moving the 2nd paragraph to the
end of the Section.

Q3: The first sentence of Section 3 says:

    "This document builds on the specification of MPLS over UDP defined in

...and Section 4 says "MPLS over UDP/IP encapsulation".

RFC 7510 talks about MPLS-in-UDP, so please align the terminology.