Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-secdir-lc-farrell-2020-09-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-09-10 | |
Requested | 2020-08-27 | |
Authors | Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Lou Berger , Andrew G. Malis , Stewart Bryant | |
I-D last updated | 2020-09-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -04
by Harish Sitaraman
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Joerg Ott (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Stephen Farrell (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Stephen Farrell |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/qa-4hzVr3DaOKCOMeCKSSb0gKh0 | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-09-24 |
review-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-udp-ip-06-secdir-lc-farrell-2020-09-24-00
(Sorry for the missed review deadline.) Other than general doubts about "I'll only use this in one administrative domain", the only specific thing that concerned me here was that draft-ietf-detnet-security doesn't seem to include any analysis of detnet/UDP (and indeed says that detnet runs over IP) and the security considerations section here is purely by reference. Given that draft-ietf-detnet-security seems to have done a reasonable job of analysis, it's a pity to not have that for the detnet/UDP case. All that said, I don't have any concrete problems to highlight with detnet/UDP, though of course I've not been thinking about this as $dayjob, so there may be issues there.