Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-06
review-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2015-04-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-05-06 | |
| Requested | 2015-04-23 | |
| Authors | Yong Cui , Qiong Sun , Ian Farrer , Yiu Lee , Qi Sun , Mohamed Boucadair | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-04-27 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -06
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Christer Holmberg (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Almost ready | |
| Completed | 2015-04-27 |
review-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-06-genart-lc-holmberg-2015-04-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-dhc-dynamic-shared-v4allocation-06 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 27 April 2015 IETF LC End Date: 6 May 2015 IETF Telechat Date: N/A Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. However, I have spotted a few places where I think some additional text is needed. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial Issues: Section 2: Q_2_1: The text says that the solution is not applicable for network access over shared mediums. I think it would be useful to add some words describing why that is the case. Section 10: Q_10_1: The text says: “The security considerations in [RFC2131] and [RFC7341] are to be considered.” I think a little more text is needed, talking about what type of security considerations are referenced. Q_10_2: In section 10.1, I don’t think you need to refer to section 2 for the target use-case. Similar to my comment Q_2_1, you should give a little more information about the DoS attack vulnerability in a shared medium.