Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01
review-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2015-05-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-06-01
Requested 2015-05-20
Authors Lyle Bertz , Serge Manning , Brent Hirschman
I-D last updated 2015-05-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -01 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian E. Carpenter
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 02)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-05-25
review-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2015-05-25-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dime-congestion-flow-attributes-01.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2015-05-25
IETF LC End Date: 2015-06-01
IESG Telechat date:

Summary:  Ready
--------

Comment:
--------

This is a clear and well-written document. I do have two comments, however:
1) I suggest that somebody with ECN smarts should glance at it (e.g. David Black).
2) The shepherd suggests in the writeup that it should formally update RFC 5777.
But since it describes optional extensions to RFC 5777 that are strictly compatible,
I don't think that's right.