Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp-04
review-ietf-dime-drmp-04-secdir-lc-yu-2016-05-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dime-drmp
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-05-03
Requested 2016-03-17
Authors Steve Donovan
Draft last updated 2016-05-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Taylor Yu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Taylor Yu
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dime-drmp-04-secdir-lc-yu-2016-05-05
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 07)
Review result Has Nits
Review completed: 2016-05-05

Review
review-ietf-dime-drmp-04-secdir-lc-yu-2016-05-05

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Ready with nits

The security considerations section of this document seems substantial.
I approve of including a treatment of the lack of end-to-end security in
the protocol.  This is a topic to which authors of other documents
should pay more attention.

Editorial:

Page headers say "DOIC" instead of something like "DRMP"; is this
intentional?  Section 11.3 title "End-to End-Security Issues" should
probably be "End-to-End Security Issues".