Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13

Request Review of draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-01-25
Requested 2021-01-11
Authors Mark Jones , Marco Liebsch , Lionel Morand
I-D last updated 2021-01-26
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Catherine Meadows
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13-secdir-lc-meadows-2021-01-26
Posted at
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-01-26
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other  last call comments.

This draft presents the commands a Diameter node could use to communicate with
multiple sessions of the Diameter simultaneously.  The Security Considerations
section mentions two issues.  One is that the use of bulk commands introduces
increases the ease of implementing certain types of DoS attacks  because a
single command, e.g. to terminate a session, could affect multiple sessions
instead of just one.  The other is that current  security mechanisms employed 
by Diameter do not enforce end-to-end security, and so make it difficult to
trust information received from non-adjacent nodes.  Work is ongoing on
end-to-end security for Diameter, so it is premature to address end-to-end
security in this document, which instead relies on available security

I think this is a reasonable summary of the security considerations.  Since
end-to-end security for Diameter is a work in progress, it would be premature
to attempt to address it in this document.  I consider this document Ready.