Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-09
review-ietf-dime-ovli-09-genart-telechat-davies-2015-09-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dime-ovli |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-08-18 | |
Requested | 2015-08-13 | |
Authors | Jouni Korhonen , Steve Donovan , Ben Campbell , Lionel Morand | |
I-D last updated | 2015-09-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Elwyn B. Davies
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-dime-ovli-09-genart-telechat-davies-2015-09-21
|
|
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-09-21 |
review-ietf-dime-ovli-09-genart-telechat-davies-2015-09-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dime-ovli-09.txt Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 2015/08/19 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: 2015/08/20 Summary: Ready. Thanks for addressing my last call comments (except one minor change got missed - see below). A good document. [Apologies for somewhat late review - in inter-continental airport limbo.] Major issues: None Minor issues: s4.2: I commented on the possibility of turning off an abatement algorithm at last call. Having thought this through, I assume that in general it would be sufficient for a reacting node to stop announcing its capability. If this is correct it might be worth mentioning this (as with changing presumably this would be an exceptional case but could happen). I don't think that anything very special would have to be done with stateful algorithms but maybe a comment would help. Nits/editorial comments: s5.2.1.1: Adding a pointer to s7.3 was discussed and agreed but hasn't happened. _________________