Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07
review-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07-genart-lc-dunbar-2018-05-03-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-04-12
Requested 2018-03-29
Authors Lyle Bertz , David Dolson , Yuval Lifshitz
I-D last updated 2019-03-01 (Latest revision 2018-09-13)
Completed reviews Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joel Jaeggli (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Michael Tüxen (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 12)
Result Almost ready
Completed 2018-05-03
review-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07-genart-lc-dunbar-2018-05-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dime-rfc4006bis-07
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2018-05-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-12
IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-24

Summary:
The document is well written for the part describing how end-users/CC-client
request services from Credit Control server.

Is it mandatory to use the Section 4 provided mechanism for Rating Input to the
Credit Control? Can the Credit Control get credit rating from offline process
(manual, offline, etc)?

Major issues: None

Minor issues: Is Section 4 mechanism mandatory?

Nits/editorial comments:

Regards, Linda Dunbar