Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36
review-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36-dnsdir-lc-gieben-2024-12-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 38) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-12-04 | |
| Requested | 2024-11-20 | |
| Authors | Todd Herr , John R. Levine | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-12-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -36
by Ines Robles
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -36 by Scott Hollenbeck (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -36 by Stephen Farrell (diff) Dnsdir Last Call review of -36 by R. (Miek) Gieben (diff) Dnsdir Telechat review of -38 by R. (Miek) Gieben |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | R. (Miek) Gieben |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/pUfmmlSIF0-WgdCNDMjVBzRDRsU | |
| Reviewed revision | 36 (document currently at 38) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2024-12-08 |
review-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36-dnsdir-lc-gieben-2024-12-08-00
Hello, I've just reviewed version 36 of this draft. Found some nits, and I really have only one question. In section 4.5 RFC 1035 is referenced on how a TXT record is structured. However another question I got is how to deal with multiple _dmarc TXT records? Is that allowed or is the assumption there is only one? (Admittedly I haven't read the normative references, so it may be explained there, if so I'm happy to be told, "Miek, go read the references.") Also section 4.5: DMARC's use of the Domain Name Service => Domain Name System In section 4.10, there is this text: If x < 8, remove the left-most (highest-numbered) label from the subject domain. If x >= 8, remove the left-most (highest-numbered) labels from the subject domain until 7 labels remain. It took me quite a while to realize that '...until 7 labels remain' is the key difference here. This may benefit from some slight rewwording? Typos: * section 4.10: discovry - discovery * section 5.1.8: [Author Domain]{#author-domain) -> [Author domain](#author-domain)