IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-20
review-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-20-genart-lc-robles-2025-11-27-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 25) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-11-28 | |
| Requested | 2025-11-14 | |
| Authors | Steven M Jones , Alessandro Vesely | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-05-19 (Latest revision 2026-04-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -20
by Christian Huitema
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -20 by Marco Tiloca (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -20 by Ines Robles (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -20 by Tim Wicinski (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -23 by Christian Huitema (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ines Robles |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ZQ5NLGIhDs4eIEg8XmxgrS0qebs | |
| Reviewed revision | 20 (document currently at 25) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-11-27 |
review-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-20-genart-lc-robles-2025-11-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-20 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 2025-11-27 IETF LC End Date: 2025-11-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This document describes "failure reports," or "failed message reports", which provide details about individual messages that failed to authenticate according to the DMARC mechanism. I believe the document is ready. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: None Thanks for this document, Ines.