Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-23
review-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-23-secdir-telechat-huitema-2025-12-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 25) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-01-06 | |
| Requested | 2025-12-17 | |
| Authors | Steven M Jones , Alessandro Vesely | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-05-19 (Latest revision 2026-04-18) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -20
by Christian Huitema
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -20 by Marco Tiloca (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -20 by Ines Robles (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -20 by Tim Wicinski (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -23 by Christian Huitema (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Christian Huitema |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/SUSNOGvVPYziUgwKWHVUkfvaRwQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 23 (document currently at 25) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-12-20 |
review-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-23-secdir-telechat-huitema-2025-12-20-00
I have reviewed the differences between draft-20 and draft-23. The draft-20 was already a pretty good document, and I only suggested fixing two minor nits. Draft-23 addresses my first nit: the text describing the denial-of-service attacks is now moved to the security consideration section. It also addresses my second, to make the privacy issues more prominent in the introduction -- and it indeed did not need much text to do that.