Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04
review-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2017-02-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2017-02-07
Requested 2017-01-24
Authors Charles E. Perkins , Vijay Devarapalli
I-D last updated 2017-02-09
Completed reviews Intdir Early review of -03 by Tatuya Jinmei (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joseph A. Salowey
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 08)
Result Has nits
Completed 2017-02-09
review-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2017-02-09-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

This document is ready with nits.

I was pleased that the security considerations does discuss some privacy
issues.  I think it would help to emphasize that identifiers can be
trackable since many of the IDs in the draft are long lived.  The section
does mention it, this suggestion is just for emphasis.

First sentence of second paragraph of security considerations.

"Some identifiers (e.g., IMSI) are considered to be private information and
some are long lived allowing for tracking of an individual or device."

Cheers,

Joe