Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04
review-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2017-02-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2017-02-07 | |
Requested | 2017-01-24 | |
Authors | Charles E. Perkins , Vijay Devarapalli | |
I-D last updated | 2017-02-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -03
by Tatuya Jinmei
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2017-02-09 |
review-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04-secdir-lc-salowey-2017-02-09-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is ready with nits. I was pleased that the security considerations does discuss some privacy issues. I think it would help to emphasize that identifiers can be trackable since many of the IDs in the draft are long lived. The section does mention it, this suggestion is just for emphasis. First sentence of second paragraph of security considerations. "Some identifiers (e.g., IMSI) are considered to be private information and some are long lived allowing for tracking of an individual or device." Cheers, Joe