Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05

Request Review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-02-10
Requested 2017-01-27
Authors Zhiwei Yan, Jong-Hyouk Lee, XiaoDong Lee
Draft last updated 2017-02-17
Completed reviews Intdir Early review of -03 by Jean-Michel Combes (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Chown (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05-genart-lc-shirazipour-2017-02-17
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2017-02-17


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <>.

Document: draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2017-02-10
IETF LC End Date:   2017-02-10
IESG Telechat date: -

This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have comments.

Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
"However, the current PMIPv6 specification does not specify related operations when an HNP renumbering is happened.".
Suggestion for more clarity:
"However, the current PMIPv6 specification does not specify related operations when an HNP renumbering has happened (e.g. due to change of service provider, change of site topology, etc.).".
-[Page 3], "to an MAG"---->"to a MAG"

-[Page 7], "the proceduer"--->"the procedure"

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research