Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-10-14
Requested 2019-09-30
Authors Carlos J. Bernardos , Antonio de la Oliva , Fabio Giust , Juan-Carlos Zúñiga , Alain Mourad
I-D last updated 2019-10-14
Completed reviews Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by Joerg Ott (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Ines Robles (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ines Robles
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2019-10-14
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2019-10-14
IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat


I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written.

The document proposes Distributed Mobility Management for Proxy Mobile IPv6 in
which mobility sessions are anchored at the last IP hop router called MAAR
(mobility anchor and access router). The document focuses on the required
extensions to effectively support simultaneously anchoring several flows at
different distributed gateways.

I have a minor concern detailed in Nits section.

Major issues:Not Issues found

Minor issues: Not Issues found

Nits/editorial comments:

It would be nice to specify IANA Section with more details, such as indicating
the registry which the option type belong, etc. [rfc8126]

Thank you for this document,