Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04
review-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04-genart-lc-robles-2019-10-14-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2019-10-14 | |
| Requested | 2019-09-30 | |
| Authors | Carlos J. Bernardos , Antonio de la Oliva , Fabio Giust , Juan-Carlos Zúñiga , Alain Mourad | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-10-14 | |
| Completed reviews |
Tsvart Last Call review of -04
by Joerg Ott
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Vincent Roca (diff) Genart Last Call review of -04 by Ines Robles (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Vincent Roca (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ines Robles |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Abon6nNroeUBqsFueZ2vvTWdzQ0 | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 06) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2019-10-14 |
review-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04-genart-lc-robles-2019-10-14-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-04 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 2019-10-14 IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-14 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written. The document proposes Distributed Mobility Management for Proxy Mobile IPv6 in which mobility sessions are anchored at the last IP hop router called MAAR (mobility anchor and access router). The document focuses on the required extensions to effectively support simultaneously anchoring several flows at different distributed gateways. I have a minor concern detailed in Nits section. Major issues:Not Issues found Minor issues: Not Issues found Nits/editorial comments: It would be nice to specify IANA Section with more details, such as indicating the registry which the option type belong, etc. [rfc8126] Thank you for this document, Ines.