Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22
review-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22-secdir-lc-dunbar-2023-04-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 25)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2023-04-10
Requested 2023-03-13
Authors Warren Kumari , Paul E. Hoffman
I-D last updated 2023-09-14 (Latest revision 2023-05-04)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Telechat review of -23 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -22 by Vladimír Čunát (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -22 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -22 by Niclas Comstedt (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -22 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -22 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_R3sr5bZHLwm912lhKPswG-Qg_8
Reviewed revision 22 (document currently at 25)
Result Has nits
Completed 2023-04-06
review-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22-secdir-lc-dunbar-2023-04-06-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last-call comments.

This draft is to reserve .alt as the Special-Use Domain Names. Section 1 says
that the technique is to address problems discussed in RFC8244. After reading
the RFC8244, I learned RFC8244 covers many more problems, not just the .alt
Special-Use Domain Names. Suggest adding the specific section of the RFC8244
for reference.

Question: Are the .local and  .onion part of the Special-use domain names
registered in IANA?

Thank you very much,
Linda Dunbar