Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22
review-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22-secdir-lc-dunbar-2023-04-06-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 25) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2023-04-10 | |
Requested | 2023-03-13 | |
Authors | Warren "Ace" Kumari , Paul E. Hoffman | |
I-D last updated | 2023-04-06 | |
Completed reviews |
Dnsdir Telechat review of -23
by Vladimír Čunát
(diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -22 by Vladimír Čunát (diff) Artart Last Call review of -22 by Barry Leiba (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -22 by Niclas Comstedt (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -22 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Genart Last Call review of -22 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22-secdir-lc-dunbar-2023-04-06
|
|
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_R3sr5bZHLwm912lhKPswG-Qg_8 | |
Reviewed revision | 22 (document currently at 25) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2023-04-06 |
review-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-22-secdir-lc-dunbar-2023-04-06-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last-call comments. This draft is to reserve .alt as the Special-Use Domain Names. Section 1 says that the technique is to address problems discussed in RFC8244. After reading the RFC8244, I learned RFC8244 covers many more problems, not just the .alt Special-Use Domain Names. Suggest adding the specific section of the RFC8244 for reference. Question: Are the .local and .onion part of the Special-use domain names registered in IANA? Thank you very much, Linda Dunbar