Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2020-09-14
Requested 2020-08-31
Authors Duane Wessels, Piet Barber, Matt Weinberg, Warren Kumari, Wes Hardaker
Draft last updated 2020-09-12
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Donald Eastlake (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Elwyn Davies (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Donald Eastlake (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Elwyn Davies 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09-genart-lc-davies-2020-09-12
Posted at
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 14)
Review result Ready with Nits
Review completed: 2020-09-12


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 2020-09-12
IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready with a few minor nits.  Apologies for truncated versions - some strange effect caused by changing tabs in a Chrome browser that sent the incomplete review before I was ready. 

Major Issues

Minor Issues:
s2.3:  The example of the presenation format shown in s2.4 has the sequence of hex digits representing the Digest surrounded in parentheses.  This is not specified in s2.3.  Which is right?

Nits and Editorial:

s1, para 2: s/verification the zone as a whole/verification of the zone as a whole/

s1.1, last para: s/aka AXFR SIG/identified as the AXFR SIG/

s3.1, para 4:  I think this should be RECOMMENDED.

s9:  I have a suspiscion that you mean David Black rather than David Blacka.