Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09
review-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09-genart-lc-davies-2020-09-12-01
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2020-09-14 | |
| Requested | 2020-08-31 | |
| Authors | Duane Wessels , Piet Barber , Matt Weinberg , Warren "Ace" Kumari , Wes Hardaker | |
| I-D last updated | 2020-09-12 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -09
by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09-genart-lc-davies-2020-09-12
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/d3lKqT5RAcotzxpabG3VHy21u-o | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2020-09-12 |
The information below is for an old version of the document.
review-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09-genart-lc-davies-2020-09-12-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest-09 Reviewer: Elwyn Davies Review Date: 2020-09-12 IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready with a few minor nits. Apologies for truncated versions - some strange effect caused by changing tabs in a Chrome browser that sent the incomplete review before I was ready. Major Issues None Minor Issues: s2.3: The example of the presenation format shown in s2.4 has the sequence of hex digits representing the Digest surrounded in parentheses. This is not specified in s2.3. Which is right? Nits and Editorial: s1, para 2: s/verification the zone as a whole/verification of the zone as a whole/ s1.1, last para: s/aka AXFR SIG/identified as the AXFR SIG/ s3.1, para 4: I think this should be RECOMMENDED. s9: I have a suspiscion that you mean David Black rather than David Blacka.