Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03-artart-lc-hollenbeck-2024-07-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2024-08-08
Requested 2024-07-18
Authors Joe Abley , Jakob Schlyter , Guillaume Bailey , Paul E. Hoffman
I-D last updated 2024-07-29
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -00 by Florian Obser (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -03 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -03 by Scott Hollenbeck (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -04 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -05 by Petr Špaček (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -06 by Petr Špaček
Assignment Reviewer Scott Hollenbeck
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/_6y8nCwukt0xqSG0rH6gH56hi4g
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-07-29
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03-artart-lc-hollenbeck-2024-07-29-00
I'm the assigned ART area reviewer for this draft. It's ready with only a few
small nits:

Section 5:

"More information about IANA's policies and procedures for how the
cryptographic keys for the DNS root zone are managed (also known as "DNSSEC
Practice Statements" or "DPSs") can be found at
https://www.iana.org/dnssec/procedures
(https://www.iana.org/dnssec/procedures)."

The URL is shown twice. The URL in parentheses can be removed.

The [DPS] reference includes this URL, with a reference year of 2020:

https://www.iana.org/dnssec/procedures

However, that URL leads to a page of policy and procedure statements. This is
the URL for the cited practice statement, with a reference year of 2024:

https://www.iana.org/dnssec/procedures/ksk-operator/ksk-dps-20240315.html

I tried to validate the XML examples using the RELAX NG Compact Schema provided
in Section 2.1 but was unable to find a working online validator. It all looks
correct, but I can't confirm that everything is valid.