Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-08-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2024-08-20
Requested 2024-08-06
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Peter Koch , Matt Larson , Paul E. Hoffman
I-D last updated 2024-08-19
Completed reviews Dnsdir Early review of -00 by Di Ma (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -05 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -05 by Di Ma (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -06 by Patrick Mevzek (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by Dirk Von Hugo (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dirk Von Hugo
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/c9Xzv7i_ZRsgl03r43nVQRZL5Js
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-08-19
review-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-06-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2024-08-19-00
Dear all,
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/

Though not being a DNS expert I think that the document is very useful, well
written, and complete for the time being to help improve security and
reliability of DNS practice. I have only few very minor suggestions for IMO
improved readability:

P.1:
current NS Resource Record Set => current Name Server (NS) Resource Record Set

P.3:
for the IN class. => for the Internet class (IN class). /perhaps add ref. (e.g.
to RFC 1034)

P.4:
Therefore, it is important that resolvers be able to => Therefore, it is
important that resolvers are able to

P.8:
and it gets a query => and it receives a query

Thanks and best regards
Dirk