Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-10
review-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-10-opsdir-lc-bhandari-2018-06-25-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-06-25 | |
Requested | 2018-06-11 | |
Authors | Ray Bellis , Stuart Cheshire , John Dickinson , Sara Dickinson , Ted Lemon , Tom Pusateri | |
I-D last updated | 2018-06-25 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -10
by Shwetha Bhandari
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Genart Telechat review of -11 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Shwetha Bhandari |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 20) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2018-06-25 |
review-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-10-opsdir-lc-bhandari-2018-06-25-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Reviewer: Shwetha Bhandari Review result: Ready This document defines new DNS Stateful Operations(DSO) messages with TLV syntax to communicate operations within persistent DNS stateful sessions i.e. DNS over TCP or DNS over TLS/TCP. The DSO messages with TLVs are extensible for new operations in future. The document meets the Operations and Management Review Checklist - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5706#appendix-A. There is no operational/manageability consideration section included in the document, however the proposed extension does not have a significant operational impact on the network.