Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2023-06-13
Requested 2023-05-30
Authors Stuart Cheshire , Ted Lemon
I-D last updated 2023-06-08
Completed reviews Dnsdir Last Call review of -07 by David C Lawrence (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Shivan Kaul Sahib (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -07 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -08 by David C Lawrence
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Jean-Michel Combes
Assignment Reviewer Brian Trammell
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-dnssd-update-lease by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2023-06-08
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC if you reply to or forward this review.

This document presents no concerns from a transport standpoint.

The approach in section 4.2 to prevent synchronized flooding when a network
regains power seems sensible, and appears to be backed up by implementation
experience. Yay!

Section 6 refers to RFC 1536 for transmission control when using UDP. It seems
to me that this advice is in line with section 3.1.3 of RFC 8085 (BCP 145),
which seems to apply as this should be a low-volume application. But it would
be nice if this document made that point explicitly.